Key result
Landiolol facilitated conversion to sinus rhythm in 75.7% of non-surgical and 70.1% of surgical critical care patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation, with a 13% incidence of hypotension.
Why the study?
New-onset atrial fibrillation is common in critical care, and this review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of landiolol for heart rate control and conversion to sinus rhythm in this setting.
Does landiolol improve sinus conversion in critical care patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation?
Systematic Review (n=324)
Does landiolol improve sinus conversion in critical care patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation?
Landiolol appears effective for sinus conversion of new-onset atrial fibrillation in critical care settings, though current evidence is limited to low-quality, non-comparative studies.
Background: new-onset atrial fibrillation remains a common complication in critical care settings, often necessitating treatment when the correction of triggers is insufficient to restore hemodynamics. The treatment strategy includes electric cardioversion in cases of hemodynamic instability and either rhythm control or rate control in the absence of instability. Landiolol, an ultrashort beta-blocker, effectively controls heart rate with the potential to regulate rhythm. Objectives This review aims to compare the efficacy of landiolol in controlling heart rate and converting to sinus rhythm in the critical care setting. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive review of the published literature from 2000 to 2022 describing the use of landiolol to treat atrial fibrillation in critical care settings, excluding both cardiac surgery and medical cardiac care settings. The primary outcome assessed was sinus conversion following landiolol treatment. Results: Our analysis identified 17 publications detailing the use of landiolol for the treatment of 324 critical care patients. While the quality of the data was generally low, primarily comprising non-comparative studies, landiolol consistently demonstrated similar efficacy in controlling heart rate and facilitating conversion to sinus rhythm in both non-surgical (75.7%) and surgical (70.1%) settings. The incidence of hypotension associated with landiolol use was 13%. Conclusions: The use of landiolol in critical care patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation exhibited comparable efficacy and tolerance in both non-surgical and surgical settings. Despite these promising results, further validation through randomized controlled trials is necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lévy et al. (2024) conducted a systematic review in New-onset atrial fibrillation in critical care settings (n=324). Landiolol was evaluated on Sinus conversion following landiolol treatment. Landiolol facilitated conversion to sinus rhythm in 75.7% of non-surgical and 70.1% of surgical critical care patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation, with a 13% incidence of hypotension.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: