Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Context: Sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB) is a diagnostic challenge. Xpert®Mycobacterium tuberculosis/rifampin (MTB/RIF) provides a rapid diagnosis on high-quality biological specimen obtained by bronchoscopy. Aims: The aim of this study is to evaluate Xpert® MTB/RIF on bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid in sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce PTB patients. Settings: Tertiary care hospital in India. Design: This was prospective observational study. Materials and Methods: Between January 2015 and November 2016, we prospectively recruited sputum-smear negative and sputum-scarce patients under evaluation for PTB and performed BAL. Sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values were calculated for the diagnosis of PTB on BAL fluid for acid-fast bacilli smear and Xpert® MTB/RIF using liquid culture as the reference standard and compared to the final diagnosis based on composite reference standard. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated with 95% class intervals. McNemar's test was used for comparison of sensitivities. Results: Of the 60 patients included, 52 (88.3%) had a final diagnosis of PTB and 16 (26.7%) were culture confirmed. Xpert® MTB/RIF had a sensitivity and specificity of 81% (54%–96%) and 73% (56%–85%) in culture confirmed cases; 46% (32%–60%) and 100% (63%–100%) for the final diagnosis; 32% (17%–51%) and 100% (54%–100%) in culture negative cases, respectively. Culture had a sensitivity of 32% (20%–47%) for the final diagnosis. Conclusions: In sputum smear-negative and sputum-scarce patients with clinico-radiological features of PTB Xpert® MTB/RIF has good sensitivity for diagnosis on BAL fluid. It is useful even when cultures are negative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soneja et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: