Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Data-driven, decision-making technologies used in the justice system to inform decisions about bail, parole, and prison sentencing are biased against historically marginalized groups (Angwin, Larson, Mattu, & Kirchner 2016). But these technologies' judgments-which reproduce patterns of wrongful discrimination embedded in the historical datasets that they are trained on-are well-evidenced. This presents a puzzle: how can we account for the wrong these judgments engender without also indicting morally permissible statistical inferences about persons? I motivate this puzzle and attempt an answer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Clinton Castro (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: