Qualitative study reveals two distinct meaning-making approaches among collaborative leaders, suggesting that adaptive leadership shifts power dynamics and reframes conflict into shared growth.
This study explores co-production – as a form of co-design – as a collaborative process where stakeholders and professionals co-create change through ‘doing with’, emphasising that transformative practices demand advanced meaning-making, a dimension often underexplored in understanding how such collaborative forms are facilitated. The investigation revealed that experienced leaders utilise two distinct meaning-making approaches to co-production that influence their roles and process dynamics. Both cultivate a collaborative environment wherein every stakeholder’s voice is valued. Approach 1 is grounded in equality, consensus, and a sense of responsibility for others. Approach 2 emphasises shared learning, self-care for the leader, and process responsibility while viewing co-production as an emergent, experimental practice. As complexity increases, conflict evolves into a less personal, more fluid element that is crucial for learning and growth. Moreover, power transitions from a hierarchical commodity to a shared, collective experience, thereby leading to a shift in leadership from a controlling to a more adaptive, ‘light touch’ approach. The study underscores the importance of recognising these meaning-making strategies to cultivate more mindful, inclusive co-production and co-design practices. The findings advocate for a reflective journey towards understanding co-production, oneself, and the collective to lead to practices that resonate with stakeholders’ diverse perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjellström et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: