Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systemic and regional haemodynamic variables were measured at the baseline and after saline or 5-HT infusions (5 microgram kg-1 min-1, i.v.) or methysergide injections (0.5 mg kg-1, i.v.). Cardiac output and its complete distribution were measured by the radioactive microsphere (15 micrometer diam) technique. Although 5-HT did not change the systemic variables, methysergide caused a moderate increase in systolic and mean blood pressure and heart rate. 5-HT caused a substantial increase in gastric and a moderate increase in cerebral and myocardial blood flow at the expense of that to the lungs (arteriovenous shunt + bronchial flows), kidneys and skin. While methysergide was able to reduce the vascular responses to 5-HT in stomach, skin, kidneys, heart, lungs and brain, the drug itself, like 5-HT, decreased the number of microspheres reaching the lungs. Since a large number of 15 micron microspheres can escape through the arteriovenous anastomoses to lodge in the lungs it seems likely that both 5-HT and methysergide can reduce the 'non-nutrient' flow through these anastomoses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Forsyth et al. (1978) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: