Why the study?
Do cardiac MRI and MUGA provide good diagnostic options compared to echocardiography for evaluating anthracycline-induced chronic cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors?
Do cardiac MRI and MUGA provide good diagnostic options compared to echocardiography for evaluating anthracycline-induced chronic cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors?
Cardiac MRI and MUGA are valuable complementary imaging modalities to echocardiography for detecting subclinical anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity in childhood cancer survivors.
Supports complementary MRI/MUGA use in survivors; leaves open prospective validation versus echocardiography.
Anthracyclines are widely used for the treatment of solid tumors in pediatric oncology. However, their uses may be limited by progressive chronic cardiotoxicity related to the cumulative dosage. The aims of this study are to compare diagnostic techniques and prepare an algorithm for diagnosis of anthracycline induced chronic cardiotoxicity. The patients were evaluated according to age, sex, time elapsed since the last dose of anthracycline treatment, presence of cardiovascular symptoms, follow-up duration, type of anthracycline, cumulative anthracycline dose, and concomitant mediastinal radiation therapy. Late subclinical cardiotoxicity was detected by history, physical examination, electrocardiography (ECG), Holter monitor, echocardiography (ECHO), radionuclide ventriculography (MUGA), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-seven male and 19 female patients with a median age of 11.2 ± 4.6 (range, 3.5-22.0) years were included in the study. Patients were grouped according to cumulative anthracycline doses. Subclinical cardiac dysfunction was detected in 20 patients by at least one of ECHO, MRI or MUGA after anthracycline chemotherapy. We revealed that other than ECHO, MRI and MUGA have high clinical importance for evaluating subclinical late cardiac complications in children treated with anthracyclines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Başar et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: