This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
• Government environmental attention promotes polluting enterprises’ withdrawal. • Government environmental attention affects heterogeneous enterprise exit. • Environmental regulation, subsidies and innovation are internal mechanisms. • Market and institutional environment affect the impact of environmental attention. • A scientific basis for the improvement of the environmental policy system is provided. Based on the heterogeneous firm theory, this study uses text analysis and microeconometric methods such as a two-way fixed-effect model, a subsample regression and an interactive term regression to investigate the influence of local government's environmental attention on the withdrawal of polluting firms. Research shows that such attention can accelerate the latter by increasing the severity of environmental regulations, reducing government subsidies and increasing technological innovation. Additionally, the influence of such attention on the exit of polluting firms weakens as market concentration, official corruption and fiscal decentralization increase. This study introduces government's environmental attention and explores its internal mechanisms and external factors, thus improving the framework of environmental governance and helping to understand the “black box” of environmental policy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: