Key result
This paper describes the statistical analysis plan for the SingHypertension cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a multicomponent intervention for uncontrolled hypertension; no results are reported.
Why the study?
Uncontrolled hypertension confers the highest attributable risk of cardiovascular disease in Singapore, with sub-optimal blood pressure control rates.
Does a multicomponent primary care intervention reduce systolic blood pressure in adults with uncontrolled hypertension?
RCT (n=1,000)
Open-label
Cluster randomized
Yes
Does a multicomponent primary care intervention reduce systolic blood pressure in adults with uncontrolled hypertension?
This statistical analysis plan outlines the methodology for a cluster randomized trial evaluating whether a multicomponent primary care intervention can effectively lower blood pressure in patients with uncontrolled hypertension.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiovascular disease (O'Lone E, Viecelli AK, Craig JC, Tong A, Sautenet B, Herrington WG, et al., Am J Kidney Dis 76(1):109-20, 2020) remains the leading cause of death in Singapore. Uncontrolled hypertension confers the highest attributable risk of CVD and remains a significant public health issue with sub-optimal blood pressure (BP) control rates. The aim of the trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention (MCI) versus usual care on lowering BP among adults with uncontrolled hypertension visiting primary care clinics in Singapore. This article describes the statistical analysis plan for the primary and secondary objectives related to intervention effectiveness. METHODS: The study is a cluster randomized trial enrolling 1000 participants with uncontrolled hypertension aged ≥ 40 years from eight primary care clinics in Singapore. The unit of randomization is the clinic, with eight clusters (clinics) randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either MCI or usual care. All participants will be assessed at baseline, 12 months, and 24 months with measurements of systolic and diastolic BP, antihypertensive and statin medication use, medication adherence, physical activity level, anthropometric parameters, smoking status, and dietary habits. The primary objective of this study is to assess the effectiveness of MCI versus usual care on mean SBP at the 2-year follow-up. The primary outcome is SBP at 24 months. SBP at baseline, 12, and 24 months will be modeled at the subject level using a likelihood-based, linear mixed-effects model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis with treatment group and follow-up as fixed effects, random cluster (clinic) effects, Gaussian error distribution, and adjustment to degrees of freedom using the Satterthwaite approximation. Secondary outcomes will be analyzed using a similar modeling approach incorporating generalized techniques appropriate for the type of outcome. DISCUSSION: The trial will allow us to determine whether the MCI has an impact on BP and cardiovascular risk factors over a 2-year follow-up period and inform recommendations for health planners in scaling up these strategies for the benefit of society at large. A pre-specified and pre-published statistical analysis plan mitigates reporting bias and data driven approaches. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02972619 . Registered on 23 November 2016.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allen et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Uncontrolled hypertension (n=1,000). Multicomponent intervention (algorithm-driven single pill combination, motivational conversation, telephone follow-up, discounts) vs. Usual care was evaluated on Mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 24 months. This paper describes the statistical analysis plan for the SingHypertension cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a multicomponent intervention for uncontrolled hypertension; no results are reported.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: