Key result
Compared with liberal blood transfusion, restrictive blood transfusion increased the risk of cardiovascular events (RR 1.44) in orthopedic patients, primarily driven by an increase in myocardial infarction.
Why the study?
To explore the prognostic differences between restrictive and liberal blood transfusion strategies in orthopedic surgery patients.
Does a restrictive blood transfusion strategy increase cardiovascular events or infection compared to a liberal strategy in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery?
Meta-Analysis (n=7,833)
Does a restrictive blood transfusion strategy increase cardiovascular events or infection compared to a liberal strategy in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery?
Relative Risk: 1.44 (95% CI 1.15–1.8)
p-value: p=0.001
In patients undergoing orthopedic surgery, a restrictive blood transfusion strategy increases the risk of cardiovascular events, particularly myocardial infarction, compared to a liberal transfusion strategy.
May favor liberal transfusion to reduce MI risk in orthopedic surgery; challenges guidelines endorsing restrictive strategies.
BACKGROUND: A meta-analysis was conducted to explore the prognostic differences of restrictive blood transfusion (RBT) versus liberal blood transfusion (LBT) strategies in orthopedic patients. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and clinicaltrials.gov up to 20 October 2024. The quality of included studies was assessed according to Cochrane risk of bias, and quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. We performed sensitivity and publication bias analyses and used trial sequential analysis (TSA) to assess the risk of random error in the analysis results. RESULTS: = 0%) rather than congestive heart failure. There were no significant differences between transfusion strategies in infection, thrombotic events, mortality, delirium and length of hospitalization. Results of subgroup analyses indicate that in patients at high risk for cardiovascular disease, RBT increases the risk of myocardial infarction and length of hospitalization. In addition, RBT are associated with lower overall infection rates and shorter length of hospitalization after joint replacement or revision surgery; and are associated with an increased risk of myocardial infarction after fracture repair surgery (RR = 1.79; 95% CI: 1.21-2.65, P = 0.004). The TSA results show that transfusion rate and mortality (≥ 60 days) have reached the required information size. However, the evidence regarding the efficacy for the remaining outcomes analyzed remains inconclusive, likely due to insufficient numbers of patients in the existing studies. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with LBT, RBT increases the risk of cardiovascular events in orthopedic patients but does not affect adverse outcomes such as infection, thrombotic events, mortality, and delirium. TRIAL REGISTRATION: No patients were involved in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2025) conducted a meta-analysis in Orthopedic surgery (n=7,833). Restrictive blood transfusion vs. Liberal blood transfusion (Hemoglobin threshold mainly 9.0-10.0 g/dL) was evaluated on Cardiovascular events (RR 1.44, 95% CI 1.15-1.80, p=0.001). Compared with liberal blood transfusion, restrictive blood transfusion increased the risk of cardiovascular events (RR 1.44) in orthopedic patients, primarily driven by an increase in myocardial infarction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: