Key result
On-site automated external defibrillator use improves survival from sudden cardiac arrest compared to emergency services, with athletes facing an overall risk of 1:50,000 athlete-years.
Why the study?
Sudden cardiac arrest during sports events carries poor outcomes unless treated with an AED, yet stadiums vary in AED use.
Does on-site automated external defibrillator (AED) use improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest in basketball and soccer stadiums compared to emergency services?
Does on-site automated external defibrillator (AED) use improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest in basketball and soccer stadiums compared to emergency services?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On-site AEDs in sports stadiums improve survival from sudden cardiac arrest compared to reliance on emergency services, highlighting the need for their integration into stadium medical plans.
Sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) during sports events has a dramatic impact on stadium-goers and the public and is often associated with poor outcomes unless treated with an automated external defibrillator (AED). Despite this, stadiums vary in AED use. This review aims to identify the risks and incidences of SCA, and the use of AEDs in soccer and basketball stadiums. A narrative review of all relevant papers was conducted. Athletes across all sports face an SCA risk of 1:50,000 athlete-years, with the greatest risk of SCA in young male athletes (1:35,000 person-years) and black male athletes (1:18,000 person-years). Africa and South America have the poorest soccer SCA outcomes at 3% and 4% survival. AED use on-site improves survival greater than defibrillation by emergency services. Many stadiums do not have AEDs implemented into medical plans and the AEDs are often unrecognisable or are obstructed. Therefore, AEDs should be used on-site, use clear signalling, have certified trained personnel, and be incorporated into stadiums' medical plans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bassi et al. (2023) conducted a review in Sudden cardiac arrest. Automated external defibrillators (AEDs) vs. Defibrillation by emergency services was evaluated on Survival. On-site automated external defibrillator use improves survival from sudden cardiac arrest compared to emergency services, with athletes facing an overall risk of 1:50,000 athlete-years.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: