Why the study?
Does contact heat stimulation evoke reproducible potentials from the trigeminal territory compared to laser stimulation in humans?
Does contact heat stimulation evoke reproducible potentials from the trigeminal territory compared to laser stimulation in humans?
Contact heat stimulation yields large-amplitude brain potentials and nociceptive reflexes related to Adelta input, but is not suitable for C-fibre potential recording.
Contact heat at 51°C may substitute for laser in Aδ trigeminal potentials; leaves open reproducible C-fiber recording.
Contact heat stimuli have been reported to excite mechano-thermal nociceptors and to evoke brain potentials (CHEPs) from the limbs. We investigated whether contact heat evokes reproducible CHEPs from the trigeminal territory and may prove a reliable diagnostic tool in facial neuropathic pain. We applied contact heat stimuli to the perioral and supraorbital regions; CHEPs were recorded from the vertex in 20 controls and 2 patients with facial neuropathic pains, and reflex responses from the orbicularis oculi and masticatory muscles in 5 controls. We studied the correlation between CHEP data and perceptive ratings, site of stimulation, and age. Finally, we compared CHEPs with laser evoked potentials (LEPs). Contact heat stimuli at 51 degrees C evoked vertex potentials consisting of an NP complex similar to that elicited by laser pulses, though with a latency some 100-ms longer. Perioral stimulation yielded higher pain intensity ratings, shorter latency and larger amplitude CHEPs than supraorbital stimulation. CHEP data correlated significantly with age. Contact heat stimuli at 53 degrees C evoked a blink-like response in the relaxed orbicularis oculi muscle and a silent period in the contracted masseter muscle. In patients with facial neuropathic pain the CHEP abnormalities paralleled those seen with LEPs. We were unable to achieve reproducible signals related to C-receptor stimulation by contact heat stimuli at 41 degrees C in the ten subjects in whom they were tested. Contact heat stimulation, as well as laser stimulation, easily yields large-amplitude brain potentials and nociceptive reflexes, both related to the Adelta input. However CHEPs are not suitable for C-fibres potentials recording.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Truini et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: