Key result
The Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.910) and a four-factor solution for measuring patient confidence.
Why the study?
The patient experience of AF involves daily self-care behaviors and confidence to manage the condition, but no standardized self-report measure of AF patient confidence exists.
Is the Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale a reliable and valid measure of patient confidence in self-management of atrial fibrillation?
Cross-Sectional (n=120)
Is the Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale a reliable and valid measure of patient confidence in self-management of atrial fibrillation?
The newly developed CALM scale shows promising reliability and validity for measuring patient confidence in self-management of atrial fibrillation.
Should not yet guide AF self-management counseling; leaves open confirmatory validation and linkage to outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The patient experience of atrial fibrillation (AF) involves several daily self-care behaviors and ongoing confidence to manage their condition. Currently, no standardized self-report measure of AF patient confidence exists. The purpose of this study is to provide preliminary support for the reliability and validity of a newly developed confidence in AF management measure. METHODS: This study provides preliminary analysis of the Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale, which was rationally developed to measure patient confidence related to self-management of AF. The scale was provided to a sample of AF patients N = 120, (59% male) electronically through a patient education platform. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Cronbach's α were employed to provide preliminary assessment of the validity and reliability of the measure. RESULTS: PCA identified a four-factor solution. Internal consistency of the CALM was considered excellent with Cronbach's α = .910. Additional PCA confirmed the value of a single factor solution to produce a total confidence score for improved utility and ease of clinical interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: Initial assessment of a novel scale measuring patient confidence in managing AF provided promising reliability and validity. Patient confidence in self-management of AF may prove useful as a key marker and endpoint of the patient experience beyond QOL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tripp et al. (2021) conducted a cross-sectional in Atrial fibrillation (n=120). Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale was evaluated on Reliability and validity of the CALM scale (Cronbach's α = 0.910). The Confidence in Atrial FibriLlation Management (CALM) scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.910) and a four-factor solution for measuring patient confidence.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: