This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The epidemiological assessment of wine consumption usually has been obtained using self-reporting questionnaires. In this study, two metabolomic approaches, targeted and untargeted, were applied to 24-h urine samples from a cohort of La Rioja (Spain) (aged 52–78), comparing moderate and daily wine consumers (20 males and 13 females) without diet intervention, versus non-consumers (8 males and 35 females). Results showed that the non-targeted metabolomics approach has allowed for the annotation of sixteen compounds in 24-h urine samples from regular wine-consumers that were not detected in the urine of non-wine consumers. Additionally, the targeted metabolomics approach showed a wide range of phenol metabolites, mainly hepatic phase-II conjugates, whose concentration was significantly higher in the urine of wine consumers. As a novelty, this study focuses on discovering the main urinary biomarkers of regular wine consumption involving free-living volunteers, without dietary intervention or restrictions that might alter their regular behaviors and lifestyles. • Metabolomics approaches determined wine-consumption biomarkers in urine samples. • LC-HRMS demonstrated potential with 16 compounds annotated in urine samples. • More metabolites were detected using HILIC than RP chromatography methods. • Wine biomarkers were consistent among regular wine consumers' urine samples. • Study results may apply to the general population regarding wine intake effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiménez-Salcedo et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: