Key result
Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome compared with conventional therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.41-0.72).
Why the study?
To evaluate whether genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy reduces the rates of cardiovascular events and bleeding events in patients with ACS.
Does genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy reduce cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared to conventional therapy?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,900)
Does genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy reduce cardiovascular and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndromes compared to conventional therapy?
Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in ACS patients appears to reduce ischemic events without increasing bleeding risk compared to conventional therapy.
To evaluate whether genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy reduces the rates of cardiovascular events and bleeding events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We systematically searched Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (searched in September 2018) for controlled studies evaluating genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in ACS with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or without PCI. The primary endpoint was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, targeted vessel revascularization and/or major bleeding. A total of five studies involving 2900 patients were included. Compared with the conventional group, the genotype-guided group had a decreased risk of primary composite outcomes (RR= 0.54; 95% CI: 0.41–0.72; I2 = 30%), death (RR = 0.54; 95% CI: 0.32–0.94; I2 = 21%), MI (RR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.31–0.88; I2 = 49%), targeted vessel revascularization (RR = 0.59; 95% CI: 0.35–0.98; I2 = 0%), but not for stroke (RR = 0.53; 95% CI: 0.22–1.24; I2 = 0%) and bleeding events (RR = 0.80; 95% CI: 0.51–1.25; I2 = 33%). Genotype-guided strategies could reduce the rates of cardiovascular events without increasing bleeding events compared with conventional treatment in ACS. Future multi-centre genotype-based randomized control trials are required to confirm these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2019) conducted a meta-analysis in Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (n=2,900). Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy vs. Conventional therapy was evaluated on Composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, targeted vessel revascularization and/or major bleeding (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.72). Genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy reduced the risk of the primary composite outcome compared with conventional therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome (RR 0.54; 95% CI 0.41-0.72).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:
More on Percutaneous coronary interventionMore from Biomarkers