Key result
Waist-to-height ratio ≥63/58 increased the risk of total in-hospital complications (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.13-3.33; p=0.017) and heart failure in patients with acute STEMI treated with primary PCI.
Why the study?
Do anthropometric parameters influence clinical severity and prognosis in patients with acute STEMI treated with primary PCI?
Cohort (n=250)
Do anthropometric parameters influence clinical severity and prognosis in patients with acute STEMI treated with primary PCI?
Waist-to-hip ratio and waist-to-height ratio are better predictors of acute STEMI severity and in-hospital complications than BMI, though anthropometry does not appear to influence 12-month prognosis.
The aim of this study was to investigate the controversial influence of anthropometry on clinical severity and prognosis of acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We prospectively analyzed 250 patients with acute STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (September 2011 – September 2012). They were grouped according to the following anthropometric parameters: body mass index (BMI) (<25.0, 25.0-29.9, ≥30.0 kg/m²), waist circumference (WC) (<102/88, ≥102/88 cm), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (<0.90/0.85, ≥0.90/0.85) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) (<53/49, 53/49-62/57, ≥63/58). The groups were analyzed by baseline, as well as severity (clinical, laboratory, echocardiography, coronary angiography, in-hospital complications) and prognostic parameters (major adverse cardiovascular events and sick leave duration during 12-month follow up). Patients with BMI <25.0 kg/m2 had the highest rates of dyspnea and those with BMI ≥30.0 kg/m² had the longest hospitalization and widest stents; patients with WHR ≥0.90/0.85 had higher rates of significantly stenosed proximal/middle coronary segments, while those with WHtR ≥63/58 had the highest rates of heart failure and total in-hospital complications (p<0.05). BMI <25.0 kg/m2 increased (odds ratio (OR) 2.00, confidence interval (CI) [1.09-3.68], p=0.026) and BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m2 reduced (OR 0.52, CI [0.30-0.91], p=0.022) the risk of dyspnea; WHR≥0.90/0.85 increased the risk of significant proximal/middle coronary segment stenosis (OR 3.34, CI [1.13-9.86], p=0.029) and WHtR ≥63/58 the risk of heart failure (OR 2.05, CI [1.13-3.71], p=0.017) and total in-hospital complications (OR 1.94, CI [1.13-3.33], p=0.017) (p<0.05). In conclusion, WHR and WHtR are better anthropometric parameters than BMI in predicting acute STEMI severity, while WC has no influence on it. Anthropometry has no influence on prognosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marko Mornar Jelavić (2016) conducted a cohort in Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=250). Anthropometric parameters (BMI, WC, WHR, WHtR) vs. Lower categories of anthropometric parameters was evaluated on Total in-hospital complications (OR 1.94, 95% CI 1.13-3.33, p=0.017). Waist-to-height ratio ≥63/58 increased the risk of total in-hospital complications (OR 1.94; 95% CI 1.13-3.33; p=0.017) and heart failure in patients with acute STEMI treated with primary PCI.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: