High photovoltaic (PV) penetration can reduce grid-energy imports but may worsen voltage performance in radial distribution feeders. This paper develops a unified mixed-discrete PV–BESS planning framework that jointly optimizes siting, sizing, hourly storage operation, and a common inverter voltage-support gain subject to inverter capability limits. Five metaheuristic algorithms are compared over 30 independent runs on the 33-bus system using an explicitly converged under-relaxed fixed-point iteration. Adaptive Differential Evolution achieves the lowest best and median fitness values. Its best solution reduces active-loss energy by 38.0%, grid-energy import by 14.9%, peak grid power by 12.5%, voltage deviation by 53.7%, voltage-violation duration by 100%, and annual cost by 8.4% relative to the no-PV/no-BESS case. A separately optimized comparison shows substantial additional voltage and loss improvements from inverter reactive-power support. Objective-weight, voltage-penalty, BESS energy-CAPEX, and representative-day analyses clarify key planning trade-offs. On the 69-bus feeder, the 30-run ADE validation reduces active-loss energy by 51.2%, grid-energy import by 19.5%, peak grid power by 10.5%, voltage deviation by 39.5%, voltage-violation duration by 98.8%, and annual cost by 12.2%. A supplementary analysis with a higher PV upper bound further clarifies the influence of the adopted planning limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oğuzhan Ceylan (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: