cumulated data. The theorist must wait until late in this process for interest ing principles and structure ; meanwhile, he is repelled by a forbidding thicket of data. Such a field is difficult to review, too. This brief resume concentrates on certain relatively structured areas. It touches others lightly, but runs out of space without even mentioning a number of important prob lems or !1Undreds of worthy experiments. We need a book on the subject, at least. Fortunately, we were in the process of getting one at the time of this writing: OPerant and Psychology, edited by Honig (51). research, as intended by this review, includes roughly those studies that measure the or relative frequency of a freely repeatable response. Branching from this core are methods that restrict response free dom in some way, or that record response variables other than rate. Skinner's insistence on the measure (84) has been amply justified, but, as he re cently reiterated (86) , it is ultimatel y response probabi lit y under given con ditions that we wish to predict. Experimental analysis is moving in this direc tion, breaking down the indefinite period of time implied by rate into short time segments. One reason for this shift has been the gradual recognition 1 The survey of the literature pertaining to Operant Conditioning was con
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Blough et al. (1965) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: