Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 16, 2001BMJOpen Access

Randomised controlled trial of cardiotocography versus Doppler auscultation of fetal heart at admission in labour in low risk obstetric populationCommentary: changes between protocol and manuscript should be declared at submissionCommentary: research governance must focus on research trainingCommentary: Approach to power calculations has to be realistic

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

GMG. Mires

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

G. Mires (2001) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f36d3b5ccfbbe2d84eee6https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7300.1457
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficacy and safety of intrapartum electronic fetal monitoring: an update1995 · 185 citations
  2. 2Continuous electronic heart rate monitoring for fetal assessment during labor2001 · 225 citations
  3. 3Screening of the fetal heart rate in early labour1988 · 20 citations
  4. 4Intra‐ and inter‐observer variability in the assessment of intrapartum cardiotocograms1987 · 193 citations
  5. 5Description, evaluation and clinical decision making according to various fetal heart rate patterns1992 · 22 citations