Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study examined efficient sampling for content analyzing monthly consumer magazines during a five-year period. As with other forms of media content, sampling of monthly consumer magazines is more efficient using a stratified sample than a simple random sample. When sampling from a five-year period, a constructed year of twelve issues (one issue randomly selected from among the issues in each month) is more efficient and accurate than twenty randomly selected issues - the smallest simple random sample meeting standards of efficiency on all content measures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacy et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: