Why the study?
Does the use of an implantable loop recorder improve definitive diagnosis and treatment in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope?
Does the use of an implantable loop recorder improve definitive diagnosis and treatment in patients with recurrent unexplained syncope?
This review highlights the utility of implantable loop recorders for the definitive diagnosis of recurrent unexplained syncope, particularly in the context of their availability in India.
May support ILR consideration for unexplained syncope where available; leaves open prospective outcome trials in Indian populations.
Syncope is a symptom of many underlying disease states, which range from the relatively benign to the life threatening. There are numerous investigations done for patients with recurrent unexplained syncope which may have very low yield when it comes to making a definitive diagnosis. Recently, the implantable loop recorder (ILR) for continuous monitoring of the cardiac rhythm has been launched in India. This review will briefly discuss these current available strategies and focus on the usefulness of an ILR in the definitive diagnosis and treatment of patients with a recurrent unexplained syncope.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puri et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: