Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Chromospheric ages are calculated for 115 stars. Reported uncertainties of about 10% in the Vaughan-Preston S values lead to accidental errors in the calculated ages ranging from about 50% at 3×10⁸yr to about 15% at 10¹⁰yr. Rotational velocities are plotted against chromospheric age to reveal the rotational spin-down trajectories of solar-type stars of various masses. Also, the stellar birthrate, the [Fe/H] ratios, and the peculiar velocities of the sample stars are presented as a function of chromospheric age. The results confirm that a star's rotation depends only on its mass and age. The smooth, continuous decline of both a star's rotation and its activity across the Vaughan-Preston gap is demonstrated. The simples and only remaining tenable interpretation of the gap is that it is caused by time variations in the stellar birthrate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D. C. Barry (1988) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: