A distinguishing feature of China's recently launched emissions trading system (ETS) is its rate-based structure. This structure governs the way emissions allowances are allocated and the conditions for compliance, and it has important implications for system performance. We show that the rate-based structure implies a wedge between the marginal costs of emissions abatement as perceived by firms and society's marginal costs of abatement. Moving to a mass-based system would eliminate this wedge and thereby yield significant gains in terms of cost-effectiveness and efficiency (aggregate net benefits). We indicate that these gains could be realized while addressing concerns about distributional equity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goulder et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: