This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Complete understanding of the nitrogen cycle is hindered by the challenges of measuring denitrification at watershed scales. Here, we refine the open‐channel approach, a fundamental field method in stream biogeochemistry that can be used to quantify denitrification in streams based on N 2 and N 2 O production. We explicitly consider biogenic, groundwater‐derived N 2 inputs to a stream, investigate patterns of diel and spatial variability in stream N 2 fluxes, and explore the use of two potential natural tracers of gas exchange, argon and radon, in place of the artificial tracers often employed in open‐channel studies. We conducted two open‐channel studies, 12 h and 24 h in duration, in a channelized stream on the eastern shore of Maryland. Twenty‐two to forty‐three percent of total N 2 inputs from groundwater and stream sediments to the stream were biogenic, with the remainder coming from atmospheric N 2 in groundwater recharge. Of biogenic N 2 (bN 2 ) inputs, 37–100% came from groundwater and the remaining 0–63% were from in‐stream production. Radon can be measured continuously in the field and, unlike other potential natural tracers of gas exchange (Ar and O 2 ), has a negligible atmospheric concentration. This provides more consistent estimates of the evasion coefficient K (min −1 ) and lower uncertainty than argon. Furthermore, the relative constancy of N 2 fluxes during nighttime hours suggested the possibility of a simplified radon‐based sampling procedure requiring ∼ 6–8 h per site. This approach enables quantification of bN 2 at many points within a stream system and estimation of watershed‐scale bN 2 fluxes from stream beds and inflowing groundwater.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Knee et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: