Why the study?
The study was conducted to create a preoperative predictive model for prolonged PACU stay after outpatient surgery and compare it with an existing UCSD model.
Does a new preoperative predictive model accurately predict prolonged PACU stay compared to the UCSD model in outpatient surgical patients?
Does a new preoperative predictive model accurately predict prolonged PACU stay compared to the UCSD model in outpatient surgical patients?
A newly developed preoperative predictive model identified general anaesthesia, obstructive sleep apnoea, surgical specialty, and scheduled case duration as strong predictors of prolonged PACU stay.
Supports preoperative PACU risk stratification; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Study objective: To create a preoperative predictive model for prolonged post-anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay for outpatient surgery and compare with an existing (University of California-San Diego, UCSD) model. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: Post-anaesthesia care unit. Patients: Outpatient surgical patients discharged on the same day in a large academic institution. Preoperative data were collected. The study period was three months in 2016. Measurements: Prolonged PACU stay defined as a length of stay longer than the third quartile. We utilized multivariate regression analyses and bootstrapping statistical techniques to create a predictive model for prolonged PACU stay. Main results: Four strong predictors for prolonged PACU stay: general anaesthesia, obstructive sleep apnoea, surgical specialty and scheduled case duration. Our model had an excellent discrimination performance and a good calibration. Conclusion: We developed a predictive model for prolonged PACU stay in our institution. This model is different from the UCSD model probably secondary to local and regional differences in outpatient surgery practice. Therefore, individual practice study outcomes may not apply to other practices without careful consideration of these differences.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elsharydah et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: