Why the study?
Airway management can be a major concern, and the usability of LEMON and LEON scores needed evaluation against the Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Do LEMON and LEON scores accurately predict difficult intubation in patients undergoing elective oral and maxillofacial surgery?
Do LEMON and LEON scores accurately predict difficult intubation in patients undergoing elective oral and maxillofacial surgery?
LEON scores ≥4 can effectively predict difficult airway and intubation in elective maxillofacial surgeries with high sensitivity and specificity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LEON ≥4 was associated with difficult nasotracheal intubation; leaves open prospective validation before any change in OMFS airway planning.
Introduction: Airway management can be a major concern, due to the possibility of encountering difficult ventilation and intubation. The Modified Intubation Difficulty Scale (MIDS) is a quantitative scale that can objectively compare nasotracheal intubation. LEMON method which consists of following assessments; Look-Evaluate-Mallampati-Obstruction-Neck mobility and modified LEMON scores (LEON) are popular scoring systems described for airway management due to their easy usability. We aimed to evaluate usability of the LEMON and LEON scores in patients who underwent oral and maxillofacial surgery by studying correlation between each score and the MIDS. Materials and Methods: The records of 72 patients were reviewed retrospectively. At the pre-anesthetic evaluation; airway assessments were recorded according to LEMON, LEON scores; MIDS were recorded after intubation. Patients were allocated into two groups: Non-difficult (NonD; MIDS ≤5) and Difficult (D; MIDS >5). Correlations between scores were analyzed using Spearman’s rank correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve plots were used to determine possible cut-off values; specificity, sensitivity, negative-predictive values for LEON and LEMON scores. In all analyses, p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results: LEMON and LEON scores were correlated with the MIDS. Analysis of ROC curve plots revealed 2 cut-off values (≥4 and ≥5) for LEMON; 1 cut-off value (≥4) for LEON score. Among the scores, LEMON (≥4), LEON had the highest sensitivity and negative-predictive values (both 100%); LEON showed higher specificity than the LEMON (≥4) (96.7% vs 91.8%). LEMON (≥5) had the highest specificity (98.4%) but the lowest sensitivity (90.4%), negative-predictive value (90.9%) among the group. Conclusion: LEON scores ≥4 can be effectively used with 100% sensitivity, 96.7% specificity and, 100% negative-predictive-value for predicting difficult airway and intubation in elective maxillofacial surgeries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şengel et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: