Why the study?
Residual risk of cardioembolic or cerebrovascular events and major bleeding risks with current antithrombotic therapies remain unmet medical needs in ischemic stroke prevention.
Do Factor XI inhibitors reduce the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism without increasing major bleeding compared to standard therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation or prior stroke?
Do Factor XI inhibitors reduce the risk of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism without increasing major bleeding compared to standard therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation or prior stroke?
Factor XI inhibitors offer a novel approach to uncouple thrombosis from hemostasis for stroke prevention, though clinical efficacy and safety profiles vary significantly among different agents in development.
Heterogeneous Factor XI inhibitor results in AF warrant caution against class assumptions; leaves open agent-specific efficacy versus current anticoagulants.
Stroke is one of the most common causes of mortality and disability worldwide. Antithrombotic therapy represents the mainstay in primary and secondary prevention, both in cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic stroke. Particularly, direct oral anticoagulants play a crucial role in atrial fibrillation, the most common cause of cardioembolic stroke, whereas single or dual antiplatelet therapy is preferred in non-cardioembolic stroke. However, the limitations related to the residual risk of cardioembolic or cerebrovascular events, and the risk of major bleeding, still represent unmet medical needs. To overcome them, new drugs inhibiting Factor XI (FXI) and Factor XII have been proposed, with a selective inhibition of contact pathway of coagulation, delineating a new anticoagulant approach. This review provides a summary of the currently available evidence and future perspectives on FXI inhibitors, that can represent an additional therapeutic option in the primary and secondary prevention of cardioembolic and non-cardioembolic ischemic stroke, also in challenging therapeutic contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prisco et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: