Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: To investigate flip angle (FA)-dependent T1 bias in chemical shift-encoded fat-fraction (FF) and to evaluate a strategy for correcting this bias to achieve accurate MRI-based estimates of liver fat with optimized signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three obese patients, 14 men/19 women, aged 57.3 ± 13.9 years underwent 3 Tesla (T) liver MRI including MR-spectroscopy and four three-echo-complex chemical shift-encoded MRI sequences using different FAs (1°/3°/10°/20°). FF was estimated with R2* correction and multi-peak fat spectral modeling. The FF for each FA with and without T1 correction was compared with spectroscopy as a reference standard, using linear regression. Relative SNR of the magnitude data were assessed for each flip angle. RESULTS: The correlation between chemical shift-encoded MRI and spectroscopy was high (R(2) ≈ 0.9). Without T1 correction, the agreement of both techniques showed no significant differences in slope (PFlipAngle1 ° = 0.385/PFlipAngle3 ° = 0.289) using low FA. High FA resulted in significant different slopes (PFlipAngle10 ° = 0.016/PFlipAngle20 ° = 0.014. T1 bias was successfully corrected using the T1 correction strategy (slope:PFlipAngle10 ° = 0.387/PFlipAngle20 ° = 0.440). Additionally, the use of high FA (near the Ernst angle) improved the SNR of the magnitude data (FA1 vs. FA3; respectively FA1 vs. FA10 P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSION: T1 bias is a strong confounder in the assessment of liver fat using chemical shift imaging with high FA. However, using a larger flip angle with T1 correction leads to higher SNR, and residual error after T1 correction is very small.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kühn et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: