This paper reexamines Jelinek's proof that tree codes can be used to approach the rate-distortion bound. It is shown that the branching process used in Jelinek's proof is not a (strict-sense) branching process (SSBP) when the source is asymmetric. Branching processes with random environments (BPWRE) are introduced and used to extend the proof to general discrete-time memoryless sources. The theory developed indicates why a particular metric used in experiments performed better than another suggested by the original proof.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Davis et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: