Why the study?
Does increased left atrial volume predict cardiovascular events in patients originally diagnosed with lone atrial fibrillation?
Does increased left atrial volume predict cardiovascular events in patients originally diagnosed with lone atrial fibrillation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This letter highlights that increased left atrial volume in presumed lone AF may actually reflect underlying diastolic dysfunction, which could explain the higher risk of cardiovascular events.
We read with great interest the study of Osranek et al.1 on the left atrial volume as a predictor of cardiovascular events in patients originally diagnosed with lone atrial fibrillation (AF). Patients diagnosed with lone AF and normal left atria volume have a benign clinical course, in contrast to patients with increased left atrial volume who developed adverse events, i.e. death, cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure, during the three-decade follow-up. The authors suggest the use of left atrial volume measurement for risk stratification and monitoring of patients with AF. Unfortunately, in this study, diastolic function, as underlying aetiology of AF, was not measured. Although difficult to measure, diastolic dysfunction is known as risk factor for AF,2 and earlier studies have shown that diastolic dysfunction is present in patients diagnosed with lone AF.3 In this study, it remains uncertain, whether the patients with enlarged left atrial volume, indicating elevated left ventricular filling pressures are correctly diagnosed as lone AF. The notion exists that this might represent patients with underlying diastolic dysfunction, rather than lone AF, with a different clinical course.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2006 study studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: