Why the study?
Does the Cordis tantalum coil stent improve restenosis rates and clinical outcomes compared to pooled PTCA and BENESTENT-I data in patients with stable or unstable angina?
Does the Cordis tantalum coil stent improve restenosis rates and clinical outcomes compared to pooled PTCA and BENESTENT-I data in patients with stable or unstable angina?
The Cordis tantalum coil stent is effective for treating complex lesions, showing good procedural success and low rates of subacute thrombosis and restenosis at 6 months.
Promising outcomes with tantalum coil stents in complex lesions support further study; leaves open randomized confirmation versus PTCA or BENESTENT-I.
The Cordis tantalum coil stent was assessed in a nonrandomized multicenter trial: 275 patients with stable or unstable angina were entered. Clinical follow-up was for 1 year, with repeat angiography at 6 months. The major adverse cardiac event rates (MACE) were 3%, 14%, and 17% at 1, 7, and 13 months, respectively. The procedural success rate was 96% and the subacute occlusion rate 1.5%, in a group of patients over 60% of whom had ACC/AHA type B2 or C lesions. The binary restenosis rate at 6 months was 17.3%. Minimum lumen diameter increased from 1.07 +/- 0.28 mm preprocedure to 2.93 +/- 0.34 mm poststenting and at 6 months was 1.99 +/- 0.69 mm. These results demonstrate that the Cordis tantalum stent can be used to treat complex lesions with good procedural success and low rates of subacute thrombosis and restenosis at 6 months.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rothman et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: