Why the study?
Do psychosocial interventions improve smoking cessation rates in people with coronary heart disease?
Do psychosocial interventions improve smoking cessation rates in people with coronary heart disease?
This is a protocol for a Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and harms of various psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in patients with coronary heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open benefits, harms, and equity of psychosocial smoking-cessation interventions in CHD.
OBJECTIVES: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows: Primary objective To examine the benefits and harms of different types of psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in people with CHD. Secondary objectives To examine the benefits and harms of psychosocial interventions aimed solely at smoking cessation compared with multi-risk factor interventions for smoking cessation in people with CHD. To examine the benefits and harms of brief (duration of < one month) compared to extended (duration of ≥ one month) psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in people with CHD. To explore whether using a validated biochemical assessment versus a self-report of abstinence moderates the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions in people with CHD. To assess the equity of psychosocial interventions for smoking cessation in people with CHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Righi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: