Why the study?
Does an institutional bridging protocol using bivalirudin allow safe discontinuation of DAPT in patients with recent coronary stents requiring urgent surgery?
Does an institutional bridging protocol using bivalirudin allow safe discontinuation of DAPT in patients with recent coronary stents requiring urgent surgery?
A novel bivalirudin bridging protocol may offer a feasible strategy for managing patients with recent coronary stents who require urgent surgery and DAPT interruption.
Does not support practice change; case report leaves open need for prospective validation of bivalirudin bridging before urgent surgery.
Patients that receive coronary bare-metal or drug-eluting stents have to be maintained on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for at least 4 weeks or 12 months, respectively. The prolonged time period required for drug-eluting stents is the result of delayed vascular healing that is associated with the drug and the polymeric coating. Premature cessation of DAPT may precipitate life-threatening stent thrombosis. However, some urgent, unplanned surgical procedures cannot be carried out under DAPT as a result of an unacceptable bleeding risk. Therefore, in these particular patients, DAPT therapy needs to be bridged for urgent surgery to avoid stent thrombosis, yet no clinical recommendation about a specific pharmacologic protocol is currently available for this specific purpose. We report about the initial experience with a novel institutional bridging protocol using bivalirudin that has been developed and applied successfully in a limited number of patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rainer Wessely (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: