Key result
Bridging antiplatelet therapy for early surgery after coronary stenting lacks optimal management without randomized data.
Why the study?
The optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients who cannot discontinue DAPT before early surgery after coronary stent implantation remains unclear, with management primarily guided by expert opinion.
Clinical review evaluates intravenous bridging strategies in surgical patients after coronary stenting, highlighting the need for multidisciplinary risk assessment due to limited trial data.
Patients undergoing early surgery after coronary stent implantation are at increased risk for mortality from ischemic and hemorrhagic complications. The optimal antiplatelet strategy in patients who cannot discontinue dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) before surgery is unclear. Current guidelines, based on surgical and clinical characteristics, provide risk stratification for bridging therapy with intravenous antiplatelet agents, but management is guided primarily by expert opinion. This review summarizes perioperative risk factors to consider before discontinuing DAPT and reviews the data for intravenous bridging therapies. Published reports have included bridging options such as small molecule glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (eptifibatide or tirofiban) and cangrelor, an intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor. However, optimal management of these complex patients remains unclear in the absence of randomized controlled data, without which an argument can be made both for and against the use of perioperative intravenous bridging therapy after discontinuing oral P2Y12 inhibitors. Multidisciplinary risk assessment remains a critical component of perioperative care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sullivan et al. (2021) conducted a review in Patients undergoing early surgery after coronary stent implantation. Intravenous bridging therapies (eptifibatide, tirofiban, cangrelor) was evaluated. Optimal management of bridging antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing early surgery after coronary stent implantation remains unclear due to the absence of randomized controlled data.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: