September 1, 2007Open Access

Survey: retrospective survey of monitoring/safety devices and incidents of cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in France.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Population

57 cardiac surgery centers in France performing 34,496 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures in 2005.

Design

Cross-sectional

Authors

JCJ.-M. CharrièreCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers JPJérôme PélissiéInserm CVChristophe Verd

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Rare CPB incidents warrant continued vigilance; cross-sectional data leaves open whether safety device gaps drive rates or generalize.

Structured PICO

Population

57 cardiac surgery centers in France performing 34,496 cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) procedures in 2005.

Outcome

Rate of perfusion incidents, their outcomes (death, permanent sequelae), and adherence to safety and monitoring device recommendations.safety

There is a significant gap between recommended and actual use of CPB safety devices in France, and improved use could potentially avoid the majority of severe CPB-related injuries and deaths.

Limitations

Centers that returned the questionnaire were more often from the for-profit private practice sector
Centers from the public sector were geographically clustered
Some centers could not or did not want to report on specific incidents

Cite This Study

Charrière et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7f7f72319b4d83ce6573c8 https://doi.org/10.1051/ject/200739142/pdf

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Survey: retrospective survey of monitoring/safety devices and incidents of cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in France.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Limitations

Cite This Study

Survey: retrospective survey of monitoring/safety devices and incidents of cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery in France.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Structured PICO

Limitations

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider