Key result
Biventricular repair in ducto-dependent neonates is linked to increased EDLVV and ~73% long-term survival despite reoperations.
Why the study?
Whether to perform univentricular or biventricular repair in ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal left ventricle remains an unanswered question.
Does biventricular repair improve left ventricular growth and survival in ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal left ventricle?
Observational (n=20)
Does biventricular repair improve left ventricular growth and survival in ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal left ventricle?
Biventricular repair promotes secondary left heart growth in ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal LV, though reoperation rates remain high.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice toward biventricular repair; leaves open whether obstruction relief outperforms univentricular strategies given observational data.
OBJECTIVES: Increased afterload and multilevel LV obstruction is constant. We assumed that restoration of normal loading conditions by relief of LV obstructions promotes its growth, provided that part of the cardiac output was preoperatively supported by the LV, whatever the echocardiographic indexes. BACKGROUND: Whether to perform uni- or biventricular repair in ducto dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal LV (hypoplastic left heart syndrome classes II & III) remains unanswered. Echocardiographic criteria have been proposed for surgical decision. METHODS: Twenty ducto dependent neonates presented with this anomaly. All had aortic coarctation associated to multilevel LV obstruction. Preoperative echocardiographic assessment showed: mean EDLW of 12.4 +/- 3.03 ml/m2 and mean Rhodes score of -1.73 +/-0.8. Surgery consisted in relief of LV outflow tract obstruction by coarctation repair in all associated to aortic commissurotomy in one and ASD closure in 2. RESULTS: There were 3 early and 2 late deaths. Failure of biventricular repair and LV growth was obvious in patients with severe anatomic mitral stenosis. The other demonstrated growth of the left heart. At hospital discharge the EDLVV was 19.4+/-3.12 ml/m2 (p = 0.0001) and the Rhodes score was -0.38+/-1.01 (p = 0.0003). Actuarial survival and freedom from reoperation rates at 5 years were 72.5% and 46%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Biventricular repair can be proposed to ducto dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal LV provided that all anatomical causes of LV obstruction can be relieved. Secondary growth of the left heart then occurs; however, the reoperation rate is high.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Serraf et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Ducto-dependent neonates with hypoplastic but morphologically normal left ventricle (hypoplastic left heart syndrome classes II & III) (n=20). Biventricular repair (relief of LV outflow tract obstruction by coarctation repair) vs. Preoperative baseline was evaluated on End-diastolic left ventricular volume (EDLVV) at hospital discharge (p=0.0001). Biventricular repair in ducto-dependent neonates significantly increased EDLVV from 12.4 to 19.4 ml/m2 (P=0.0001), yielding a 5-year actuarial survival of 72.5% despite a high reoperation rate.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: