Why the study?
Although recommended, home blood pressure monitoring faces practical difficulties, raising interest in blood pressure telemonitoring; this review evaluates its benefits and implementation discrepancies.
Does blood pressure telemonitoring with or without remote counseling improve outcomes in patients with hypertension?
Does blood pressure telemonitoring with or without remote counseling improve outcomes in patients with hypertension?
While blood pressure telemonitoring offers short-term benefits in hypertension management, its routine clinical use requires further evidence on long-term hard clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness.
Home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is strongly recommended by current guidelines as an effective out-of-office diagnostic and monitoring tool in patients with hypertension (HTN). However, there are personal, cultural, logistic difficulties owing to low effectiveness of HBPM. These put HBPM at a disadvantage in routine clinical practice. As such, telehealth solutions are of special interest nowadays, particularly blood pressure telemonitoring (BPTM) with or without remote counseling. BPTM might become something of digital assistant in the long-term patients’ follow-up and it fits well into the practice of continuity of medical care. The purpose of this review is to highlight not only the benefits of BPTM, but important discrepancies that may impede its widespread implementation in everyday clinical work. Critical comments address the lack of long-term, high-quality studies, absence of hard clinical outcomes and uncertainty on the best technical performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ionov et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: