Why the study?
Despite appropriate management, sepsis morbidity and mortality remain high, driving research towards novel biomarkers that rapidly identify, classify, and risk-stratify disease severity to achieve prompt, targeted treatment.
Do bio-ADM and DPP3 have clinical utility as biomarkers for the management of sepsis and septic shock in the ED and ICU?
Do bio-ADM and DPP3 have clinical utility as biomarkers for the management of sepsis and septic shock in the ED and ICU?
Bio-ADM and DPP3 are promising novel biomarkers that, alongside established tools, could improve the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of sepsis in acute care settings.
Should not yet change sepsis workup or therapy; leaves open interventional trials of bio-ADM-guided care.
Early recognition and timely treatment of sepsis and septic shock is vital. Despite appropriate management, mortality and morbidity rates remain high. In recent years, many of the research efforts have been directed towards finding novel biomarkers that would rapidly identify, classify and risk-stratify the severity of sepsis in order to achieve prompt and targeted treatment of patients with sepsis and septic shock. Among these biomarkers, adrenomedullin (ADM) in the form of the biologically active fragment (bio-ADM) and dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3) have recently been in the spotlight. The aim of this narrative review is to summarize current evidence on these two novel biomarkers regarding their clinical utility in diagnosis, prognosis, treatment monitoring and therapy guidance of sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department (ED) and in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. Bio-ADM seems to be a promising biomarker with respect to the overall management of sepsis (diagnosis, severity prediction, prognosis and treatment monitoring and guidance). On the other hand, DPP3 appears to be useful mainly for sepsis prognosis and for predicting sepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Given their potential clinical utility in sepsis management, the use of these two novel biomarkers, in conjunction with established biomarkers and clinical scores, could lead to the application of refined integrated protocols in the ED and the ICU, which could promptly and effectively inform clinical decision-making in patients presenting with sepsis or septic shock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ventoulis et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: