Why the study?
Despite clear benefits, many patients with cardiovascular disease do not start, complete, or maintain cardiac rehabilitation, resulting in worse clinical outcomes.
This narrative review highlights barriers to cardiac rehabilitation adherence, particularly sex- and gender-related differences, and proposes strategies such as technology-enabled and home-based programs to improve participation.
Do not yet change CR practice; leaves open trials of gender-aware, home-based program designs.
Adherence to exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is essential for preventing and managing cardiovascular disease (CVD). Participation in CR reduces all-cause mortality by 27% and cardiac deaths by 31% and lowers rehospitalization rates while also improving functional capacity and quality of life. However, many patients do not start, complete, or maintain CR, resulting in reduced functional abilities, a higher risk of recurring events, and poorer long-term outcomes. This narrative review summarizes patterns of adherence to exercise and CR in CVD, with a specific focus on sex- and gender-related differences in referral, participation, and completion. We synthesize evidence on biological, psychological, and social barriers that limit engagement and describe emerging strategies, such as technology-enabled and home-based programs, multidisciplinary care, and family-centered models, to enhance adherence. Finally, we propose a practical, gender-aware framework for CR design and delivery that can be adjusted and evaluated across diverse healthcare settings to guide clinical practice and future research.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pagnoni et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: