Why the study?
Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death worldwide, and large-scale health system reforms and new models of care are needed to reduce CVD burden, avoidable readmissions, and access disparities in regional and rural areas.
Does a state-wide Cardiovascular Program reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and improve access to care in patients with or at risk of CVD?
Does a state-wide Cardiovascular Program reduce 30-day hospital readmissions and improve access to care in patients with or at risk of CVD?
A state-wide cardiovascular program implementing rapid access clinics and virtual care pathways successfully reduced 30-day hospital readmissions and improved access to care.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open causality and generalizability of statewide CVD access programs.
• The Cardiovascular Program helped to improve access to care and health outcomes. • Strong buy-in from all stakeholders is essential for success and sustainability. • Initiatives should be adapted based on local needs and capabilities. • Data collection and reporting requirements should balance quality with administrative effort. • The Program’s integrated and context-specific design provides insights for international application. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of death worldwide. Large-scale health system reforms, including new models of care are needed to reduce the burden of CVD. Between 2021 and 2024, Safer Care Victoria, together with the Victorian State and Australian Commonwealth governments, piloted an innovative Cardiovascular Program (Program) across the state of Victoria. The Program aimed to reduce avoidable readmissions for Victorians with CVD and improve access to CVD care for those living in regional and rural areas. The Program consisted of a range of initiatives including piloting rapid access clinics and virtual care pathways, as well as new roles to facilitate inpatient management and improve transition into the community. Across 30 health services, 10,670 people diagnosed with or at risk of CVDs received care through the Program. Compared to the pre-Program period, the Program generally reduced 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions for CVD by 1% to 14% (depending on condition type and initiative), and improved access to CVD care, including for people living in regional and rural areas. Critical success factors included seed funding, workforce buy-in and adaptability of initiatives. For long-term sustainability, the Program should consider resourcing, technical requirements, optimisation of data collection and relevance to diverse populations. Lessons learned from this pilot Program may prove useful for those jurisdictions where efforts to reduce readmission rates and improve access to cardiovascular care among rural patients have faced challenges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: