Why the study?
Does a cystatin C-based definition of CKD improve risk prediction for primary cardiovascular events compared to creatinine-based definitions in patients with diabetes?
Does a cystatin C-based definition of CKD improve risk prediction for primary cardiovascular events compared to creatinine-based definitions in patients with diabetes?
In patients with diabetes, a cystatin C-based definition of CKD independently predicts cardiovascular events and improves risk classification beyond the Framingham Risk Score, unlike creatinine-based definitions.
Cystatin C-based CKD may refine CV risk stratification in diabetes; leaves open replacement of creatinine-based definitions pending prospective validation.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cardiovascular risk of diabetic subjects with chronic kidney disease (CKD) based on different estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) equations and to evaluate which definition of CKD best improves cardiovascular risk prediction of the Framingham Cardiovascular Risk Score (Framingham-CV-RS). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CKD was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2), estimated by the creatinine-based Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equations and a cystatin C-based equation (CKD-CysC). Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) of subjects with CKD for incident cardiovascular events in a cohort of 1,153 individuals with diabetes (baseline age 50-74 years). Furthermore, the CKD definitions were added individually to a reference model comprising the Framingham-CV-RS variables and HbA(1c), and measures of model discrimination and reclassification were assessed. RESULTS: During 5 years of follow-up, 95 individuals had a primary cardiovascular event. Crude HRs were increased for all CKD definitions. However, after adjusting for established cardiovascular risk factors, HRs for both creatinine-based CKD definitions were attenuated to point estimates of 1.03, whereas the HRs for the cystatin C-based CKD definition remained significantly increased (HR 1.75 [95% CI 1.07-2.87]). Extension of the reference model by the different CKD definitions resulted in an increase in the c statistic only when adding CKD-CysC (from 0.638 to 0.644) along with a net reclassification improvement of 8.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Only the cystatin C-based CKD definition was an independent risk predictor for cardiovascular events in our diabetic study cohort and indicated a potentially better clinical utility for cardiovascular risk prediction than creatinine-based equations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schöttker et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: