Historically, theories of motor control have been based on either central or peripheral mechanisms. This article examines a current, expfieit, central theory accounting for the observed flexibility in motor performance: the generafized motor program with a multiplicative rate parameter. Reanalysis of data from a variety of motor skills reported in the literature and a detailed study of skilled typewriting show that a generalized motor program with a multiplicative rate parameter generally does not fit observed performance. Instead, the data support a composite model of motor control in which performance is determined by both central and peripheral mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Donald R. Gentner (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: