Why the study?
Does replacing the APACHE II weighted comorbidity score with other comorbidity measures improve the prediction of hospital mortality in critically ill patients?
Population
24,303 critically ill patients linked to the Western Australian hospital morbidity database.
Comparison
Replacing the APACHE II weighted comorbidity… vs Standard APACHE II weighted comorbidity score
Design
Cohort
Authors
Loading...
Retaining the original APACHE II comorbidity score remains appropriate for mortality prediction; leaves open whether novel predictors can enhance discrimination.
Does replacing the APACHE II weighted comorbidity score with other comorbidity measures improve the prediction of hospital mortality in critically ill patients?
Replacing the APACHE II comorbidity score with more comprehensive indices like Charlson or Elixhauser does not significantly improve hospital mortality prediction in critically ill patients.
Ho et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: