BACKGROUND: The detection of gene-environment interaction can provide important clues not only for resolving biological mechanisms underlying diseases, but also for disease prevention. The newly introduced case-only study was compared with traditional case-control study in terms of statistical power to detect significant gene-environment interaction. METHODS: Odds ratios for interaction were calculated in the framework of case-control study and case-only study separately, by an unconditional logistic model. Hypothetical data with 200 cases and 200 or 400 controls and real published data derived from four cancer case-control studies of genotype and smoking were used for the comparisons. RESULTS: Although odds ratio estimates for interaction were the same, 95% confidence intervals were narrower in case-only studies than in case-control studies. Similarly, there were no substantial differences in point estimates for interaction in four real cancer case-control studies between the two study designs, but the confidence intervals were narrower with the case-only study. CONCLUSIONS: Although the case-only study does not provide odds ratios for exposure or genotype alone, it is very useful for the detection of interaction, especially for screening purposes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hamajima et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: