Why the study?
Tirofiban and oral antiplatelet drugs can inhibit reocclusion and restore microvascular reperfusion during EVT, but comparative outcomes in acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion were uncharacterized.
Does the addition of periprocedural tirofiban to EVT and oral antiplatelet therapy improve recanalization rates and functional outcomes in patients with acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion?
Does the addition of periprocedural tirofiban to EVT and oral antiplatelet therapy improve recanalization rates and functional outcomes in patients with acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion?
Adding periprocedural tirofiban to EVT and oral antiplatelets improves recanalization rates in acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion without increasing hemorrhage risk, though it does not significantly improve 90-day functional outcomes.
Should not yet change practice; leaves open whether recanalization gains improve 90-day function in atherosclerotic vertebrobasilar occlusion.
Background and purpose: Tirofiban and oral antiplatelet drugs can be used to inhibit reocclusion and restore microvascular reperfusion during endovascular treatment (EVT). This study compared recanalization rates, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), 90-day mortality, and functional outcomes between periprocedural tirofiban and antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion. Methods: A total of 105 consecutive patients with acute intracranial atherosclerosis-related vertebrobasilar artery occlusion who underwent EVT + tirofiban + oral antiplatelet or EVT + oral antiplatelet therapy at the Beijing Tiantan Hospital between January 2012 and July 2018 were included. Baseline characteristics, procedural parameters, and functional outcomes were assessed. Results: Among the 105 patients, 74 underwent EVT + tirofiban + oral antiplatelet therapy, while 31 underwent EVT + oral antiplatelet drug therapy. EVT + tirofiban + oral antiplatelet therapy resulted in higher recanalization rates compared to EVT + oral antiplatelet drug therapy (93.24% versus 77.42%; p=0.038), whereas the risk for sICH, 90-day mortality, and functional independence outcomes did not differ between the groups. Logistic regression analysis revealed that EVT + tirofiban + oral antiplatelet therapy had an increased probability of higher recanalization rates (OR 0.18 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.24–24.39]; p=0.025). There were no differences in sICH (OR 0.00 [95% CI 0.00–Inf; p=0.998), 90-day mortality (OR 1.19 [95% CI 0.17–4.05]; p=0.826) or functional independence (modified Rankin score 0 to ≤ 2) (OR 1.43 [95% CI 0.23–2.17]; p=0.538) between the groups. Conclusions: Ninety-day functional outcomes of EVT + tirofiban + oral antiplatelet therapy were not superior to those of EVT + oral antiplatelet drug therapy; however, the recanalization rate was higher and the risks for sICH and 90-day mortality were lower.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: