Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 1, 2020Open Access

Clinical Outcomes of Complete Left Bundle Branch Block According to Strict or Conventional Definition Criteria in Patients with Normal Left Ventricular Function.

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Why the study?

cLBBB is associated with poor outcomes in HF but has minimal effects on CV mortality in healthy adults; risk stratification under conventional versus new strict criteria in patients with normal EF was needed.

Does complete left bundle branch block increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction?

Population

137 patients with cLBBB and LVEF > 50% plus age- and sex-matched controls

Comparison

cLBBB (conventional or strict) vs controls without intraventricular conduction abnormalities

Design

Matched cohort study

Follow-up

Median 4.3 years

Authors

HHHui‐Chun HuangNational Taiwan UniversityJWJui WangNational Taiwan UniversityYLYen‐Bin LiuCedars-Sinai Medical Center

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May warrant closer HF surveillance even with preserved EF; leaves open whether early intervention can modify associated risk.

Structured PICO

Does complete left bundle branch block increase the risk of cardiovascular mortality and heart failure in patients with normal left ventricular ejection fraction?

P
Population
137 patients with complete left bundle branch block (cLBBB) and normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF > 50%), mean age 72 ± 15 years, 56.2% men, and an age- and sex-matched control group without intraventricular conduction abnormalities.
I
Intervention
Complete left bundle branch block (cLBBB) defined by strict or conventional criteria
C
Comparator
Control group of patients without intraventricular conduction abnormalities matched for age and sex
O
Outcome
Cardiovascular mortality, heart failure admission, ejection fraction reduction to <40%, and total mortalityhard clinical

In patients with normal ejection fraction, the presence of complete left bundle branch block (whether strict or conventional) is associated with a significantly increased risk of cardiovascular mortality, heart failure admission, and ejection fraction reduction.

Cite This Study

Huang et al. (2020) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7fafb7e8dfc86a1cb8e50ehttps://doi.org/10.6515/acs.202007_36(4).20191230a
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1AHA/ACCF/HRS Recommendations for the Standardization and Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram2009 · 778 citations
  2. 2Evaluating strict and conventional left bundle branch block criteria using electrocardiographic simulations2013 · 68 citations
  3. 3Prevalence and Long‐Term Prognosis of Patients with Complete Bundle Branch Block (Right or Left Bundle Branch) with Normal Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction Referred for Stress Echocardiography2014 · 19 citations
  4. 4Left bundle branch block: from cardiac mechanics to clinical and diagnostic challenges2017 · 69 citations
  5. 52019 Focused Update of the Guidelines of the Taiwan Society of Cardiology for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Heart Failure.2019 · 53 citations