Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 17, 2021Heart

Do we need more evidence for oral anticoagulants in everyday practice?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Design

Editorial

Authors

Eue‐Keun Choi
Eue‐Keun ChoiElectrophysiologySLSo‐Ryoung LeeElectrophysiology

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Both RCT and observational data inform real-world anticoagulant decisions; leaves open optimal methods for their integration in practice.

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a7fbc556d8c9e2704ec9eeahttps://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319033
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparative effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in everyday practice2021 · 21 citations
  2. 2Antithrombotic treatment in real-life atrial fibrillation patients: a report from the Euro Heart Survey on Atrial Fibrillation2006 · 371 citations
  3. 3Meta-analysis: Antithrombotic Therapy to Prevent Stroke in Patients Who Have Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation2007 · 4,828 citations
  4. 4The Changing Landscape for Stroke Prevention in AF2017 · 282 citations
  5. 5Refining Clinical Risk Stratification for Predicting Stroke and Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation Using a Novel Risk Factor-Based Approach2009 · 6,818 citations