Benchmarking flood risk reduction in the Elbe River

The past decade has seen the development and overall acceptance of the concept of I ntegrated F lood R isk M anagement. This approach strives to balance positive and negative effects of riverine floods and combines it with risk management concepts. In practice, this has led to a diversification of flood management practices that go beyond traditional structural flood protection measures towards non‐structural measures. These include giving more space for rivers, backwards location of dykes, re‐naturalisation of flood plains and a suite of improved information systems including improved flood forecasting services, promoting flood risk awareness and self‐help capabilities. The paper describes in some detail the process of benchmarking to support effective planning, implementation and monitoring of integrated flood risk management activities that require a set of quantifiable measures, against which progress in flood risk management can be referenced. The case of the extreme E lbe R iver floods in 2002 and 2013 triggered the development and implementation of the E lbe F lood P rotection – A ction P lan that in large parts has been implemented. The paper shows the basic concepts of the E lbe F lood P rotection P lan and its actions and puts these in the context of a benchmarking framework. The paper concludes that although elements of a benchmarking concept are outlined in the A ction P lan, the establishment of benchmarking practices as a tool in flood risk management is in its infancy. The development of a consistent benchmarking procedure would have the potential to improve further the effectiveness of I ntegrated F lood R isk M anagement practices in national and international river basins.