Key result
Asymptomatic CAC ≥1,000 links to ~238% higher annualized hard coronary event rates vs severe MPI abnormalities.
Why the study?
The prognostic significance of coronary calcium remained controversial, as some believed calcification may stabilize atherosclerotic plaques.
Does a very high coronary calcium score (>= 1,000) on screening EBT predict hard coronary events in asymptomatic individuals compared to severe perfusion abnormalities on MPI?
Comparison
Asymptomatic cohort with calcium score >= 1,000 vs historical controls with severe MPI abnormalities
Design
Prospective cohort study
Follow-up
Average 17 +/- 11 months
Authors
Loading...
Asymptomatic CAC ≥1000 may support intensive prevention now; leaves open whether ischemia testing improves hard outcomes.
Cohort (n=98)
Does a very high coronary calcium score (>= 1,000) on screening EBT predict hard coronary events in asymptomatic individuals compared to severe perfusion abnormalities on MPI?
Absolute Event Rate: 25% vs 7.4%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Asymptomatic individuals with a coronary calcium score >= 1,000 have an extremely high short-term risk of hard coronary events, exceeding the risk associated with severe perfusion abnormalities on MPI.
Wayhs et al. (2002) conducted a cohort in Asymptomatic with very high coronary calcium scores (n=98). Calcium score >= 1,000 vs. Historical controls with severe abnormalities on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) was evaluated on Hard coronary events (myocardial infarction or coronary death) (p=<0.0001). Asymptomatic individuals with a calcium score ≥1,000 had a higher annualized rate of hard coronary events than historical controls with severe MPI abnormalities (25% vs 7.4%, P<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: