Why the study?
Rapid growth in percutaneous structural heart disease interventions created a need for specialized interventional imagers, but inherent challenges exist in developing training programmes that differ from traditional cardiovascular imaging pathways.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Position paper
May support dedicated interventional imagers in SHD heart teams; leaves open formal training, certification, and outcome data before practice change.
Percutaneous therapeutic options for an increasing variety of structural heart diseases (SHD) have grown dramatically. Within this context of continuous expansion of devices and procedures, there has been increased demand for physicians with specific knowledge, skills, and advanced training in multimodality cardiac imaging. As a consequence, a new subspecialty of 'Interventional Imaging' for SHD interventions and a new dedicated professional figure, the 'Interventional Imager' with specific competencies has emerged. The interventional imager is an integral part of the heart team and plays a central role in decision-making throughout the patient pathway, including the appropriateness and feasibility of a procedure, pre-procedural planning, intra-procedural guidance, and post-procedural follow-up. However, inherent challenges exist to develop a training programme for SHD imaging that differs from traditional cardiovascular imaging pathways. The purpose of this document is to provide the standard requirements for the training in SHD imaging, as well as a starting point for an official certification process for SHD interventional imager.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Agricola et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: