Why the study?
Surgical management of patients with complex intracardiac connections, VSD, and two adequately sized ventricles is challenging, requiring precise anatomical understanding of the VSD and outflow tracts to determine biventricular repair suitability.
Does transthoracic 3D-echo improve the delineation of intracardiac connections and VSD anatomy for surgical planning in patients with complex intracardiac connections and VSD?
Does transthoracic 3D-echo improve the delineation of intracardiac connections and VSD anatomy for surgical planning in patients with complex intracardiac connections and VSD?
Transthoracic 3D echocardiography provides valuable additive anatomical information over 2D echocardiography for surgical planning in patients with complex intracardiac connections and VSDs.
May aid selected complex-VSD surgical planning when 2D-echo is limited; leaves open whether 3D-echo should become routine.
The surgical management of patients with complex intracardiac connections, ventricular septal defect (VSD), and 2 adequately sized ventricles is challenging. Understanding the VSD anatomy and its spatial relationships with the outflow tracts is critical to determining the suitability for biventricular repair. Transthoracic 2-dimensional echocardiography (2D-echo) is the primary cardiac imaging tool in congenital heart disease. Transthoracic 3-dimensional echocardiography (3D-echo) has an additive role over 2D-echo in the definition of the potential baffle pathway from the VSD to the semilunar valves, the anatomical characteristics of the VSD, and any substrate for systemic outflow tract obstruction postrepair. In this paper, we describe 4 cases where transthoracic 3D-echo provided crucial delineation of the intracardiac connections and the VSD anatomy for surgical planning. We also describe our transthoracic 3D-echo protocol to evaluate these complex heart defects.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mejia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: